research notes on silent films

Archive for the ‘cultural history’ Category

Name that movie house

In 1910s, 1920s, audiences, cultural history on July 6, 2009 at 4:04 pm

Kathryn Helgesen Fuller has some details on that Essanay naming contest that gave the world the “photoplay” (1). It could have been “kinorama”or “mutodramic” (!) or even the race-inspired “photodrome” – but instead it was the submission of one Edgar Strakosch, from California,

theater owner whose own nickelodeons were named Dreamland, Bijou, and Wonderland.

Fuller also has looked at naming conventions for nickelodeons and what they reveal about early cinema’s cultural position and acceptance strategies: escapism (Amuse-U) , exoticism (Alhambra), lights (Star), cheap prices (Nickelette) — but also names that aimed to inscribe cinemas within very local contexts : as civic centers (Town Hall), or as family centers (Family Moving Picture Parlor).
Still others named their theater with names of places that had some sort of allure :

Chicago, besides having a Boston theater, was also home to a California Theater years before the film industry moved there.

Another instance of myths guiding reality…

UPDATE 31/07/09:
The curious may scroll down the list of theater names operating in Toledo, Ohio, as of 1919 (2), for confirmation: status (“Grand”, “Bijou”, “Empress” or “Princess” or “Duchess” or etc.), drama (“Quo Vadis”, “Ivanhoe”), civic (“Colonial” or “Liberty” or “National”), entertainment (“Pastime”), exotic (“Japanese Garden”, “Orient”, “Mystic”), or familiar (“Home”), etc.
Picture 2

(1) At the Picture Show: Small-Town Audiences and the Creation of Movie Fan Culture (1996)
(2) Phelan, Motion Pictures as a Phase of Commercial Amusement in Toledo, Ohio (1919)

Thought for the day

In cultural history on July 6, 2009 at 9:15 am

Orthodox perspective is anti-symbolic and puts the on-looker in a priviledged position. Any picture in perspective fixes the point from which you look. I wanted to be free to look from wherever I chose. I liked any method which allowed me to use things of the same size, whether they were near or far away.

Neurath, describing his childhood addiction for educational books with lots of visual aids, chief among which mapmaking books such as Alexander Von Humbolt’s Cosmos.

Chutzpah

In 1910s, cultural history on July 2, 2009 at 5:18 am

Lewis J. Selznick writes to the Czar of all Russia, on his recent demotion:

NICHOLAS ROMANOFF
PETROGRAD, RUSSIA
WHEN I WAS POOR BOY IN KEIV SOME OF YOUR POLICEMENT WERE NOT KIND TO ME AND MY PEOPLE STOP I CAME TO AMERICA AND PROSPERED STOP NOW HEAR WITH REGRET YOU ARE OUT OF A JOB OVER THERE STOP FEEL NO ILLWILL WHAT YOUR POLICEMAN DID SO IF YOU WILL COME NEW YORK CAN GIVE YOU FINE POSITION ACTING IN PICTURES STOP SALARY NO OBJECT STOP REPLY MY EXPENSE STOP REGARDS YOU AND FAMILY
SELZNICK
NEW YORK
(Ramsaye, Million and One Nights, 1926, p. 766)

Now, after the reports of Trotsky as a Vitagraph actor, this would have made for quite a crowded market of Russian extras !

(Sternberg’s 1928 The Last Command has of course this exact plot…)

“Kids today can’t concentrate!”

In 1910s, cultural history on December 10, 2008 at 5:02 pm

In what ought to be a series all on its own, the plus ça change series, this item from Life. Sept. 27, 1917:

THE DEATH OF CONCENTRATION

Who Killed Concentration ?

Concentration was dead, and all the birds of the air and all the forces of the earth came to do him honor.

“I,” said the Lady, “I did it with my social functions and my yearly trips to Europe. I killed Concentration.”

“I did it,” said the Highbrow, “with my lectures and reading and my uplift, not to mention my philosophical systems and vague superiorities — I was the one who killed Concentration.”

“Sorry to interrupt,” said the Parents, “but we reallly did it. We insisted upon having so many distracting things in the house, not to mention putting on more style day by day, that we were the chief, if humble, instruments in the hands of an all-wise Providence who did away with Concentration — we are the proud authors of his dissolution.”

“I did it,” said the Tango, “with my restless midnight spirit; of course I did it. I killed Concentration.”

“Which reminds me that I am the one,” remarked the Movies. “Yes, I did it with my cheap realism; how could Concentration live after I came on the stage? The mere suggestion is absurd. I accomplished the demise.”

“Pooh!” sang the Phonograph. “Wasn’t I before you? I started his death, all right. I guess I know. I killed Concentration myself!”

And then they all bowed low, and took a back seat as the real author came.

“I did it, ,didn’t I?” said the School System, and Concentration , rising out of his coffin, reparked posthumously:

“Believe me, it was you, all right.”


Hollywood and the “refined culture of today”

In cultural history on January 28, 2007 at 8:41 am

Look at this film clip introducing The Girl Can’t Help It (1956)

Only Bollywood does this as well today: taking what’s in musically, and building a color and choreography and costume extravaganza around it (that may not be as hip as the music seemed to suggest, but that’s highly entertaining).
Cinematikal has a four-part essay on Tashlin…

as a pianist…

In cultural history on January 23, 2007 at 7:13 pm

…this is a pretty funny one
iPiano
(the rest of the entries are here)